Today, the Washington State Liquor Control Board denied the City of Seattle's request to open rule-making regarding hours of alcohol service. In Washington, liquor sales will continue to be prohibited between the hours of 2-6:00 a.m.
The two Board members who voted to deny the City of Seattle's request cited concerns about public health and safety. For instance, the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs recently took a position against extended hours. Community substance abuse prevention advocates pointed to the National Prevention Strategy that recommends reducing hours of alcohol sales as a proven way to reduce excessive drinking.
In his public statement, the one Board member who voted to move forward with the City of Seattle's request states, "Our decision today begs the question of what exactly is the role of this three-person Board in the wake of Initiative 1183? If it is not to oversee a healthy and public dialogue on complex, contentious issues that deal with alcohol access, what is it? That's not for me to answer here today, but I do believe it is a conversation that will begin in the near future, and our inaction today is as good a starting point as any."
While I think that the Board did, in fact, oversee a healthy and public dialogue about a complex, contentious issue over the past few months, I also think he makes a good point about the role of the Board post-liquor privatization. I think he's right when he says that the role of the Board and the role of alcohol regulations in our state are part of a conversation that needs to continue. Those of us concerned with public health and safety should be ready for it.
Statements from each of the Board members may be viewed through the Liquor Control Board website.
Sharing information about youth substance abuse prevention so that, together, we can create safe and healthy communities.
Showing posts with label extended alcohol service hours. Show all posts
Showing posts with label extended alcohol service hours. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Monday, April 30, 2012
Liquor Control Board still seeking comments about extending alcohol service hours
In August 2011, the City of Seattle petitioned the Liquor Control Board to consider allowing jurisdictions to extend alcohol service hours beyond 2:00 a.m. (See posts from April 3, March 14 and November 15.) The Liquor Control Board hosted hearings around the state and received evenly split testimony with about 50% testifying in favor of extended hours and about 50% testifying against extended hours. The Liquor Control Board was to make a decision within the next two weeks but has postponed their decision until May 30.
From a prevention standpoint, the federal Community Prevention Services Task Force recommends against extending hours of alcohol sales/service.
In 2003, Vancouver, BC allowed bars in their Granville district to extend closing hours to 3:00 a.m. and, according to a 2007 report by the City and Police Department, between 2002 and 2006:
- The number of police calls between midnight and 6 am increased from 2,000 to over 3,500
- The number of fights doubled from around 140 to almost 300
- The number of disturbance and annoyance calls increased from approximately 310 to 410
- The number of requests for assistance to dispatch doubled from 80 to 160
- The number of stabbings and assaults in progress went from 40 to 100
The Liquor Control Board is still accepting public comments about the City of Seattle's petition. Comments may be submitted to Liquor Control Board’s Rules Coordinator.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Coalition Co-Chair testifies at Liquor Control Board hearing
On Monday, the Washington State Liquor Control Board (LCB) and the City of Seattle hosted a public hearing about whether or not the LCB should open their rule-making process and consider the City's petition to allow local jurisdictions to set their own alcohol service hours. Right now, state regulations require alcohol to stop being served at 2:00 a.m. Seattle nightclubs want to be able to serve alcohol longer, possibly 24 hours per day.
During the hearing, many people provided testimony for and against this petition. One of our Prevention WINS Co-Chairs, Gary Hothi, was among them and he is quoted in news articles about the hearing in The Seattle Times and The Stranger's Slog. Derek Franklin, from Mercer Island's DFC coalition and WASAVP board member, is quoted in another Seattle Times article.
Later this year, public hearing will also take place in Vancouver, the Tri-Cities and Spokane. More information about the petition is available on the LCB's website.
During the hearing, many people provided testimony for and against this petition. One of our Prevention WINS Co-Chairs, Gary Hothi, was among them and he is quoted in news articles about the hearing in The Seattle Times and The Stranger's Slog. Derek Franklin, from Mercer Island's DFC coalition and WASAVP board member, is quoted in another Seattle Times article.
Later this year, public hearing will also take place in Vancouver, the Tri-Cities and Spokane. More information about the petition is available on the LCB's website.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)