Discussion about Council Bill 117989 regarding public consumption begins at around 57:00 and Council Bill 117998 regarding public smoking begins at around 74:00.
To strengthen the public consumption bill so that it supports public health goals for helping youth access substance abuse-related services they may need, two items should be changed.
1. The bill should specify how the law will be
enforced among minors. While the
first “Whereas” in the bill states that Initiative 502 legalized adult possession,
the ordinance does not specifically distinguish between the enforcement of
marijuana laws among adults (21 and older) from enforcement among minors (20
and younger).
For example:
~ The bill states, “A person who
violates this section is guilty of a class 3 civil infraction under RCW Chapter
7.80.” The word “person” should be replaced with “adults 21 years old and
older” since the law is different for minors. Minors are to be referred
to the King County Juvenile Diversion program
and are not to be charged with a civil infraction. The diversion program
can help at-risk teenagers link with drug education or treatment services that
may be needed.
~ The bill states that SPD intends
to “provide a first warning for persons violating the provisions”. Since
the police play such an important public health role when it comes to linking
teenagers to the substance abuse services they may need, warnings should be
given to adults who are 21 years old and above but minors under the age of 21
should be referred to the King County Juvenile Diversion Program.
Any City ordinance dealing with the enforcement
of minors in possession of alcohol should be updated to include
marijuana. To reduce community risk factors for underage use and to link
at-risk youth with services they may need, these laws should be enforced and
the policy of referring youth to the diversion program should be followed.
2. Define
public use: Council
Bill 117989 states, “It is unlawful to open a package containing or consume
marijuana, usable marijuana or a marijuana-infused product in view of the
general public.” Though the fiscal note
attached to this ordinance says that the intent is to bring marijuana laws in
line with alcohol laws, the language is different than alcohol-related language
that states that public use of alcohol is illegal. The ordinance should
define what is meant by “in view of the general public” so that
it is clear to citizens what will be enforced and what won’t be enforced when
it comes to marijuana use outside of personal residences.
Adult behavior impacts youth behavior. All children, even teenagers,
look to adults to determine how they should act. One of the reasons
tobacco smoking rates are down among youth is because they are not exposed to
adults smoking tobacco as much as they were prior to the many smoke-free
policies adopted throughout our communities. The same holds true for
alcohol and other drugs – the more teenagers see use as a normal part of adult
life, including public life, the more likely they are to use the substances.
Both bills were referred to the full Council.
No comments:
Post a Comment